How Judicial Review Works for UK Immigration?
Judicial Review UK is a legal process where a judge examines the legality of a decision made by the Home Office or Immigration Tribunal, focusing on the decision-making process rather than the outcome itself. Judicial Review UK offers a legal avenue to challenge UKVI decisions, even if the refusal letter may suggest the opportunity for appeal is absent.
What is the Purpose of Judicial Review UK?
Judicial Review UK serves as a critical safeguard against unlawful decisions, particularly in the areas of immigration, nationality, and asylum. You can utilize it when all other options to appeal are failed. This court process allows scrutiny of public body decisions, which is important when someone’s future prospects are at risk.
The purpose of the immigration judicial review process is to ensure that public authorities act lawfully, fairly, and within their legal powers. If you have exhausted all other options and believe a decision was unlawful, our experienced immigration solicitors are here to help. We can carefully assess your case to suggest the suitable option.
When is Judicial Review Used in Immigration?
An Immigration Judicial Review in the UK is a legal process that enables individuals and organisations to challenge the decisions and actions of public authorities concerning immigration issues. Judicial Review is considered a last resort, typically pursued when all other options, such as complaints, appeals, or administrative reviews, have been exhausted.
- No automatic notification is given about this right.
- Complex legal process requiring specialised advice.
- Often used to protect someone’s future immigration prospects.
Under SRA regulation, our legal team at Axis Solicitors can seek permission to initiate the Judicial Review proceedings. We understand the frustrations that can arise from Home Office or Immigration Tribunal decisions and help you in applying for a judicial review to challenge those decisions. Contact Axis Solicitors today for a free initial assessment of your case.
What are the Primary Grounds for Immigration Judicial Review?
An Immigration Judicial Review allows you to contest an immigration decision if you believe it is unjust or unlawful. To initiate this process, you must demonstrate that you have a “sufficient interest” or standing in the matter and that there has been a breach of public law.
The three primary grounds for an Immigration Judicial Review include:
- Illegality: This ground applies when an immigration decision contradicts existing legislation, immigration rules, or violates a person’s human rights. It involves situations where the public authority has acted beyond its legal powers.
- Irrationality: A Home Office decision may be deemed irrational if it fails to consider relevant factors, includes irrelevant considerations, or is so unreasonable that no reasonable person could have made it.
- Procedural Impropriety (Unfairness): This ground covers scenarios where the decision-making process lacked fairness, such as not allowing an individual to make representations or failing to consider relevant policies. It involves a failure to follow proper procedures or a breach of natural justice.
How to Apply for an Immigration Judicial Review?
Generally pursued after other options, such as internal complaints or lower court appeals, have been exhausted. Nevertheless, in certain urgent situations where an immediate action is required, an Immigration Judicial Review can actually be a viable avenue for appeal.
Therefore, it is always recommended to consult with legal professionals to make sure that your case is eligible and that it is the appropriate legal solution.
- Considering an Immigration Judicial Review is often seen as a last resort.
Successful Judicial Review Claims
The chances of success will depend on the unlawfulness and reasons for refusal of the decision-making body. We will need to assess the merits of your case by looking at all aspects of your case. Judicial Review can be a time-consuming and complex process.
For detailed advice, kindly contact our public law team at 0808 164 4077 or email us at contact@axis.lawyer, who would be able to assess the merits of your case and discuss your case in further detail.
What Are the Costs Associated With Judicial Review in the UK?
The costs associated with a judicial review can vary depending on the complexity of the case and the length of the proceedings. Costs of a judicial review can include court fees, legal fees, and other associated costs. We understand the financial implications of a judicial review, and we offer competitive pricing to ensure that you can access justice without undue financial burden.
How to Get Permission for a Judicial Review?
Before a Judicial Review can proceed, the court must grant permission, confirming your case has sufficient legal merit.
- Complete and submit the correct claim form with clear grounds.
- Include key documents, such as the decision being challenged.
- Show an arguable case with a realistic prospect of success.
- File the application promptly, usually within 3 months of the decision.
- Request an oral renewal hearing if initial permission is refused.
- Serve copies of your claim on the respondent and interested parties
Obtaining permission is essential to move your case forward to a full Judicial Review hearing.
What Remedies You Can Get in a Judicial Review?
1. Quashing Order
- Overturns a decision or action under review, making it legally void.
- Removes the effect of the unlawful action.
- Ensures the public body starts afresh following the law.
2. Prohibiting Order
- Stops a public authority from taking a decision or action that has not yet occurred.
- Prevents potential future harm from unlawful decisions.
- Protects applicants from premature or improper actions.
3. Mandatory Order
- Compels a public body to take a specific action.
- Often used to require remaking a decision within a set timeframe.
- Ensures lawful compliance by the authority.
4. Declaration
- Provides a formal statement clarifying the law in a disputed situation.
- Confirms legal rights or obligations without ordering action.
- Can guide future conduct of public authorities.
5. Damages
- Orders the public body to pay compensation for harm caused.
- Typically available only alongside another legal remedy.
- Aims to redress losses suffered due to unlawful actions.
Process of Immigration Judicial Review
1. Seeking Permission
- Apply for permission to bring a Judicial Review, which the court must grant before proceeding.
- Permission ensures that only cases with arguable merit reach a substantive hearing.
- Legal advice is essential at this stage to prepare a strong application and evidence.
2. Filing the Claim
- The claimant submits the detailed claim form outlining the grounds for challenge.
- Supporting evidence and relevant documents are compiled and filed with the court.
- The public authority (respondent) is notified and must provide their response and evidence.
3. Pre-Hearing Considerations
- The respondent may reconsider or amend their original decision before the hearing.
- The claimant and solicitors review all documents, including evidence from the respondent.
- Early case management ensures that issues are clarified and costs are minimised.
4. Document Preparation and Bundling
- A complete hearing bundle is prepared, containing all pleadings, evidence, and legal submissions.
- The bundle is shared with the court and all parties several weeks before the hearing.
- Meticulous organisation is key to presenting a clear and persuasive case to the judge.
5. Substantive Hearing
- The substantive hearing is where the judge examines the case in detail, considering all evidence and legal arguments.
- Both parties present their case, and the judge determines whether the decision or action was unlawful.
- The court issues a judgment, which may include remedies such as quashing orders, declarations, or mandatory orders.